Instead of seeing it from Ceasar's point of view, Beans just guns him down. Ceasar comes off as being very straightforward, telling Beans that if he did this, it would put him in the middle of him and another dealer, explaining that he couldn't just change allegiance without endangering his own life. Beans meets Ceasar in his detail shop and tells him he has to work for him. But when Beans threatens a character named Ceasar, it felt like a turning point in the movie. For example, if he decided to kill other drug dealers to get them out of his way, it wasn't too shocking, since they had to know it was a dangerous lifestyle. As the story progresses, I felt like there was a logic to most of his decisions, even when he was doing something crooked. He is very straightforward and blunt about confronting every obstacle to his business. Beanie Siegel carries the story as the no-nonsense central character. The dialog feels very natural, and I believed pretty much every performance. I want to say the movie was well written, but I feel like it's hard to tell if there was a script or if the actors were mostly improvising. It was basically the same story as Scarface, but set in Philadelphia: a guy with nothing decides he wants to make a lot of money, so he starts killing people until he is the main drug dealer in his area. State Property kept me interested all the way through. Reviewed by jfgibson73 7 / 10 "Scarface" set in Philadelphia
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |